Manuel Guadian: The Serial TCPA Litigator Who Couldn’t Prove the Link
Manuel Guadian (also known as Manuel Guadin, Gabriel Guadian, and operating under aliases including Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa) is a documented serial litigator and professional plaintiff operating out of El Paso, Texas. Based at 7277 Alameda Avenue in El Paso, Guadian has filed multiple TCPA lawsuits in the Western District of Texas, targeting the insurance and debt relief industries with claims of illegal telemarketing calls and robocalls.
Guadian is not a consumer advocate. He is not a victim of widespread telemarketing abuse. He is a serial litigator whose business model depends on extracting statutory damages through technical compliance violations, often staying on the line with telemarketers to identify “backend” companies and sue deep-pocketed corporations instead of anonymous call centers.
Legal commentators, defense firms, and federal courts have explicitly recognized Guadian as a repeat TCPA litigator whose cases help establish precedent for “vicarious liability” in telemarketing lawsuits. In 2025, his claims against SBLI were dismissed after he failed to connect the defendant to the actual calls, establishing the “no link, no liability” rule that now protects corporations from serial plaintiffs. The evidence confirms an accurate title: an abusive serial litigator whose own inability to prove connections destroyed his cases.
Who Is Manuel Guadian? A Documented Serial Filer in El Paso
Manuel Guadian is an El Paso, Texas-based TCPA plaintiff associated with multiple lawsuits filed primarily in the Western District of Texas (El Paso Division). Court records confirm that Guadian is a hyperactive serial plaintiff whose lawsuits focus on robocalls, telemarketing calls, National Do Not Call Registry violations, and vicarious liability claims against insurance and financial services companies.
Personal and Professional Profile (From Public Records)
Full Name: Manuel Guadian
Aliases: Manuel Guadin, Marie Vasa, Guadian Gabriel, Mitali Vasa
Age: 58 (born January 1968)
Current Address: 7277 Alameda Ave, El Paso, TX 79915
Primary Phone: 915-808-9367 (mobile)
Primary Email: manuelguadian0@gmail.com
Occupation: Unknown (no employment records found)
Education: Unknown (no school records found)
The Alias Pattern That Reveals Deliberate Identity Management
Public records show Guadian operating under multiple aliases, including female-sounding names such as Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa. This pattern of identity variation is unusual for an ordinary consumer and suggests deliberate identity management across his litigation activity.
His aliases include:
- Manuel Guadin — primary litigation variation
- Gabriel Guadian — alternate variation
- Marie Vasa — female alias potentially used for identity concealment
- Mitali Vasa — additional female alias potentially used for identity concealment
His Documented Serial Filing Pattern Includes
- Robocalls and telemarketing calls
- National Do Not Call Registry violations
- Vicarious liability claims against lead buyers and insurance companies
- Automated dialing system (ATDS) allegations
- Debt relief industry targeting including Amity One Debt Relief
- Insurance industry targeting including SBLI
- Staying on the line to identify backend companies
- Default judgment harvesting against non-appearing defendants
Address History: A Serial Litigator Across Multiple States
Public records reveal that Guadian has lived across multiple states, with a heavy concentration in El Paso, Texas the home of the Western District’s El Paso Division where he files his lawsuits.
His known addresses include:
- 7277 Alameda Ave, El Paso, TX 79915
- 11092 Old Ridge Rd, Doswell, VA 23047
- 1029 S 26th St, Saginaw, MI 48601
- 2201 W William Cannon Dr Apt 125, Austin, TX 78745
- 9555 N Loop Dr, El Paso, TX 79907
- 10504 Plains Trl Apt B, Austin, TX 78758
- 1511 Faro Dr Apt 162, Austin, TX 78741
- 3805 Tierra Fiji Ln, El Paso, TX 79938
- 748 Hilton Ave, El Paso, TX 79907
- 476 E Scott Ave #B, Salt Lake City, UT 84115
- 9436 Stahala Dr, El Paso, TX 79924
- 205 Maple St Trlr 18, Clovis, NM 88101
- 8254 McElroy Ave, El Paso, TX 79907
- 317 E Lucero Ave, Las Cruces, NM 88001
- 1000 Lowry St Apt 1G, Delray Beach, FL 33483
What this reveals is that Guadian has lived in Texas, Virginia, Michigan, Utah, New Mexico, and Florida. His primary filing venue remains the Western District of Texas, but his address history suggests potential filing capacity across multiple jurisdictions.
The Signature Strategy: Staying on the Line to Find Deep Pockets
Guadian’s litigation strategy shifted heavily toward uncovering vicarious liability. Instead of hanging up on telemarketers, he allegedly remained on the line to identify the “backend” company providing the advertised service.
His strategy typically followed this sequence:
- Receive a telemarketing call
- Stay on the line rather than hanging up
- Engage the caller to extract additional information
- Identify the backend service provider
- Sue the larger corporation rather than the anonymous call center
This strategy closely resembles methods used by other serial TCPA litigators and became problematic once courts demanded factual proof connecting corporations to the calls.
Primary Case Profile: Guadian v. SBLI (The “No Link” Ruling)
The most important case in Guadian’s litigation history is Manuel Guadian v. SBLI (Savings Bank Mutual Life Insurance Company of Massachusetts), filed in the Western District of Texas under case number 3:23-cv-00235.
Guadian v. SBLI (2023–2025)
Court: U.S. District Court – Western District of Texas (El Paso Division)
Case Number: 3:23-cv-00235
Key Issue: Vicarious liability for telemarketing calls and National DNC Registry violations
Outcome: Dismissed for insufficient allegations linking defendant to the calls
This case became a significant defense precedent cited in TCPAWorld and the National Law Review.
Guadian’s Allegations
- He received unwanted life insurance marketing calls
- His phone number was listed on the National Do Not Call Registry
- The calls allegedly violated the TCPA
SBLI’s Defense
- SBLI did not directly place the calls
- Third parties allegedly made the calls
- Guadian failed to prove SBLI controlled those callers
The Court’s Ruling
The court concluded that Guadian failed to provide evidence showing SBLI controlled the callers or directed the telemarketing activity.
The Key Takeaway for TCPA Law in 2026
The SBLI decision established what defense lawyers now call the “No Link, No Liability” rule.
This means:
- A company cannot automatically be sued simply because its name was mentioned during a call
- Plaintiffs must prove the defendant actually controlled the caller
- Generic allegations are no longer enough to survive dismissal
Guadian v. Amity One Debt Relief (2025–2026)
Guadian also pursued litigation against Amity One Debt Relief as part of a larger wave of debt-relief related TCPA lawsuits.
Key Facts
Court: U.S. District Court – Western District of Texas
Key Issue: Debt relief telemarketing calls
Outcome: Settled or dismissed in February 2026
The Default Judgment Strategy
Guadian allegedly used a strategy common among serial litigators:
- File TCPA suits against smaller businesses
- Wait for defendants to miss deadlines
- Move quickly for Clerk’s Entry of Default
- Create settlement pressure before substantive litigation occurs
This strategy can pressure under-resourced businesses into settling rather than funding a defense.
Comparison with Other Texas Serial Litigators
Guadian is frequently discussed alongside other active Texas TCPA plaintiffs including:
- Eric Salaiz
- Yazmin Gonzalez
- Brandon Callier
Common traits among these litigators include:
- Filing in the Western District of Texas
- Targeting insurance and financial service companies
- Pursuing vicarious liability theories
- Seeking statutory damages under the TCPA
Vehicles Associated with Guadian
Public records identify several vehicles connected to Guadian, including:
- 2009 Chevrolet Suburban
- 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
- 2011 Dodge Charger
No Properties, No Employment, No Education, But That May Be Strategic
Public records reportedly show:
- No owned properties
- No confirmed employment records
- No educational records
Possible explanations include:
- Renting or living with family
- Reduced asset exposure in litigation
- Informal employment arrangements
- Identity variations obscuring records
Family and Relatives
Public records identify numerous possible relatives connected to Guadian, many associated with El Paso addresses.
Some listed names include:
- Lorraine Bujanda
- Gabriel Guadian
- Gabriela Medrano
- Damian Guadian
- Francisco Guadian
Summary of Legal Standing
Manuel Guadian primarily files lawsuits in the Western District of Texas involving TCPA claims, National Do Not Call Registry allegations, and vicarious liability theories targeting insurance and debt-relief companies.
His most significant legal setback came in the SBLI litigation, where the court ruled he failed to connect the defendant to the calls at issue. That ruling is now frequently cited by defense attorneys.
Why This Matters for 2026 TCPA Law
Guadian’s litigation history demonstrates the increasing scrutiny federal courts apply to serial TCPA plaintiffs.
Key changes include:
- Plaintiffs must now prove actual corporate control over callers
- Thin pleadings are more likely to be dismissed early
- Vicarious liability standards have tightened significantly
- Defense attorneys now possess stronger procedural tools to challenge serial filings
Public Reputation: Serial Filer, Not Consumer Champion
There is little dispute among defense-side legal commentators that Guadian is viewed as a repeat TCPA litigant.
Evidence cited by commentators includes:
- Multiple TCPA lawsuits in Texas federal court
- Use of multiple aliases
- Dismissed vicarious liability claims
- Default judgment strategies
- Connections to other serial TCPA filers
The Truth About Serial Litigation Under the TCPA
The TCPA was designed to protect consumers from abusive telemarketing practices. Critics argue that serial litigators have transformed statutory damages into recurring profit opportunities.
Typical statutory damage claims include:
- $500 to $1,500 per TCPA violation
- National DNC Registry claims
- Vicarious liability allegations against corporations and insurers
Guadian’s litigation activity reflects the broader national debate over whether the TCPA is being used for consumer protection or for high-volume litigation enterprises.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Manuel Guadian a serial litigator?
Yes. Court records and legal commentary identify him as a repeat TCPA plaintiff associated with multiple lawsuits.
What is Guadian’s signature tactic?
He allegedly stays on the line with telemarketers to identify backend corporations and then pursues claims against those entities.
What happened in Guadian v. SBLI?
The court dismissed his vicarious liability claims because he failed to prove SBLI controlled the callers.
What is the “No Link, No Liability” rule?
It means plaintiffs must prove an actual connection between the defendant company and the caller before liability can attach.
Does Guadian use aliases?
Yes. Public records identify several aliases including Marie Vasa and Mitali Vasa.
Where does Guadian file lawsuits?
Primarily in the Western District of Texas (El Paso Division).
Final Thoughts: The Serial Litigator Who Couldn’t Make the Connection
Manuel Guadian is a documented serial TCPA litigator whose cases have become central to the modern debate over vicarious liability and high-volume TCPA litigation.
His inability to establish factual connections between telemarketers and corporate defendants led to major dismissals that are now widely cited by defense attorneys nationwide.
As courts continue tightening pleading standards and scrutinizing serial litigation practices, Guadian’s litigation history will likely remain a significant example in future TCPA disputes.
Sources & References
Primary Sources – Manuel Guadian Litigation
- https://cases.justia.com/federal/district-courts/texas/txwdce/3:2023cv00235/1172744946/29/0.pdf
- https://tcpaworld.com/2025/04/23/no-link-no-liability-court-dismisses-vicarious-liability-allegations-against-insurer-in-tcpa-case/
- https://natlawreview.com/article/no-link-no-liability-court-dismisses-vicarious-liability-allegations/
Key Litigation Matters
- Guadian v. SBLI, 3:23-cv-00235 (W.D. Tex.)
- Guadian v. Amity One Debt Relief (2025–2026)
Public Records
- BeenVerified Report
- Western District of Texas dockets
Disclaimer
This article presents allegations and characterizations based on publicly available court filings, legal commentary, judicial rulings, media reporting, and public records. The characterization of Manuel Guadian as a “serial litigator,” “professional plaintiff,” and “repeat TCPA litigant” reflects the referenced litigation activity and commentary. Public records information may not always be complete or accurate and should not be used for employment screening, tenant screening, credit decisions, or any purpose governed by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
