Peter Michael Schneider is a Washington attorney whose practice has included consumer protection, TCPA litigation, collections, business disputes, contracts and civil litigation. Explore his background, bar admissions, court activity and professional history.
Peter Michael Schneider is a Washington attorney whose professional history spans consumer protection, civil litigation, business disputes, collections, contracts, personal injury matters and telecommunications-related litigation. Public attorney profiles identify Schneider with law practices in Washington and list additional admissions in California, Montana and Oregon.
His professional profile has also developed a significant connection to consumer-related litigation, including Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) matters. Public federal court records show Schneider representing plaintiffs in TCPA cases, while Washington appellate records show him appearing in other civil and commercial disputes.
This profile examines Schneider’s publicly available professional background, education, bar admissions, areas of practice, law-firm history and documented court activity.
Peter Michael Schneider is an attorney who was first admitted to practice law in Washington in 2010. His attorney profiles identify him as a graduate of Seattle University School of Law, where he earned his Juris Doctor degree in 2010.
The Lawyers.com/Martindale profile historically associates Schneider with The Schneider Law Offices, PLLC, located in Kirkland, Washington. That profile identifies areas including consumer matters, civil litigation, business and commercial disputes, contracts, collections, unlawful business practices, garnishments, personal injury and other litigation-related fields.
His more recent public court filings identify him with Northwest Debt Resolution, LLC, with a Bellevue, Washington address.
Schneider earned his Juris Doctor from Seattle University School of Law in 2010.
The Martindale profile lists his first admission as 2010 and identifies subsequent admissions in:
His multistate admissions are consistent with the broader geographic scope reflected in his attorney profiles and court appearances.
Avvo currently identifies Schneider as licensed in Washington, California and Oregon and lists Montana as resigned/retired. Avvo also currently gives his profile a 7.3 rating and identifies consumer protection as his listed practice area.
The Lawyers.com/Martindale profile connects Peter Michael Schneider with The Schneider Law Offices, PLLC, at:
9757 N.E. Juanita Drive, Suite 135
Kirkland, Washington 98034-8965
The firm profile identifies Peter Michael Schneider and Michael Edward Schneider as members and lists practice areas including real estate, corporate law, business law and tax planning.
The Kirkland address also appears in Washington appellate records from earlier litigation. For example, Schneider was listed as counsel in Columbia Recovery Group, LLC v. Bailey, a Washington Court of Appeals Division I matter filed in 2013. The court record identified him with The Schneider Law Offices, PLLC at the Juanita Drive Kirkland address.
This provides a documented link between Schneider’s earlier legal practice in Kirkland and his later work under Northwest Debt Resolution in Bellevue.
The Lawyers.com/Martindale profile lists a broad range of legal practice areas rather than limiting Schneider’s work to a single specialty.
Those areas include:
Avvo’s current profile, by contrast, categorizes his practice entirely under Consumer Protection.
The difference between the directories is significant. Martindale reflects a broader historical litigation and general-practice background, while Avvo’s current profile presents consumer protection as the primary practice area.
Consumer protection appears repeatedly throughout Schneider’s professional record.
His public legal commentary has addressed consumer-related disputes involving debt collection, creditor litigation, telemarketing and TCPA claims. His association with Northwest Debt Resolution has also placed him in litigation involving consumers and businesses.
His published materials discuss issues such as liability for telemarketing calls, TCPA damages, pleading requirements, debt collection disputes and the relationship between sellers and telemarketers.
These publications demonstrate that consumer protection and telecommunications litigation have become an important part of his publicly documented legal work.
One of the most visible aspects of Schneider’s recent practice is his work involving the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Public federal court records identify him as counsel for plaintiffs in multiple TCPA actions.
For example, in Sundstrom v. Ocean Reef Media LLC et al., filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in January 2026, Schneider appeared on behalf of plaintiff Jaxene Sundstrom. The case involved TCPA claims against multiple defendants, including Ocean Reef Media LLC, Maple Coverage LLC, Curb Sure LLC, Progressive and State Farm. The docket later reflected a notice of settlement.
In another 2026 federal case, Littman v. LeadPoint Inc. et al., Schneider represented plaintiff Ron Littman in a TCPA action in the Western District of Washington. The docket reflects Schneider’s participation in motion practice on the plaintiff’s behalf.
Schneider also appeared as counsel for Rebecca Higdon in Higdon v. Gerber Life Insurance Company et al., another Western District of Washington case involving TCPA claims.
These cases establish that TCPA litigation is not merely an area mentioned in an attorney directory. Schneider has appeared in federal court representing parties in actual TCPA disputes.
Schneider has also published material specifically addressing TCPA litigation.
His public writings have discussed:
For example, Schneider has written about the concept of ratification in TCPA cases and discussed how evidence concerning a seller’s knowledge or control over telemarketing activity can affect potential liability.
He has also published commentary analyzing individual TCPA decisions and litigation strategies.
These publications provide additional evidence of his focus on consumer and telecommunications litigation.
More recent court filings identify Schneider with Northwest Debt Resolution, LLC, located at 10900 NE 4th Street, Suite 2300, Bellevue, Washington.
A 2026 Washington Court of Appeals opinion identifies Schneider as counsel for an appellant and lists Northwest Debt Resolution as his organization.
The same Bellevue address appears in federal court filings involving Schneider’s representation of consumer plaintiffs.
This represents a different professional address from the older Kirkland listing associated with The Schneider Law Offices.
Schneider’s court activity is not limited to federal TCPA cases.
In P.S.C., Inc. v. Purdys Public House, LLC, Washington Court of Appeals Division II, No. 60806-5-II, Schneider represented Purdys Public House on appeal.
The dispute concerned the interpretation of Washington’s garnishment statute and whether a motion to reduce a garnishment judgment was timely. The Court of Appeals issued its decision on March 3, 2026, reversing and remanding the matter for further proceedings. The official Washington courts record identifies Schneider and Northwest Debt Resolution as counsel for the appellant.
This case is notable because it demonstrates Schneider’s continuing involvement in Washington appellate litigation beyond TCPA matters.
Another significant entry in Schneider’s public litigation history is the Washington Court of Appeals case involving Merchants Credit Corporation and Litigation Practice Group.
In Merchants Credit Corporation v. Litigation Practice Group P.C., No. 84104-1-I, the Court of Appeals addressed third-party claims brought against Litigation Practice Group and Peter Schneider.
The underlying litigation arose from a consumer debt-collection dispute involving David Trahan. Merchants Credit Corporation brought third-party claims concerning alleged violations of Washington’s Consumer Protection Act and federal credit-related statutes.
The Court of Appeals’ December 30, 2024 unpublished opinion identifies Peter Michael Schneider as counsel for the respondents.
Importantly, the existence of claims against an attorney or law firm should not automatically be characterized as a finding of professional misconduct. In this case, the public appellate record reflects the litigation history and Schneider’s role as counsel, while the challenged third-party claims were dismissed and the appellate court affirmed the relevant ruling.
Accordingly, this case is best understood as part of Schneider’s litigation history rather than as proof of disciplinary misconduct.
Schneider’s litigation history extends back more than a decade.
The Washington Court of Appeals record in Columbia Recovery Group, LLC v. Bailey identifies Peter Michael Schneider as counsel for respondents and associates him with The Schneider Law Offices, PLLC in Kirkland. The matter was decided in January 2013.
His earlier practice therefore included disputes involving collections and related civil litigation well before his more recent TCPA work.
Schneider’s attorney profiles show a multistate professional history.
The Martindale profile lists admissions to Washington, California, Montana and Oregon, beginning with Washington in 2010.
Avvo currently reports:
Avvo’s current profile states that it found no misconduct for the licenses displayed on the profile. It also cautions that disciplinary information may not be comprehensive and recommends checking the relevant state bar for current disciplinary status.
That distinction is important when evaluating online attorney directories because directory information can differ from official licensing records.
Avvo currently lists Schneider with a 7.3 rating and a 5.0/5.0 client-review score based on two reviews.
The two reviews date from 2012.
One client described Schneider’s work involving a partnership dissolution, distribution and incorporation of a new entity.
Another review concerned a commercial lease dispute. The reviewer stated that Schneider obtained dismissal of the landlord’s case and recovery of costs.
Avvo also displays two lawyer endorsements. One comes from a debt-collection attorney who identified the relationship as opposing counsel and described Schneider as diligent and professional. Another comes from a personal-injury lawyer who described him as hardworking and professional.
These are client and lawyer opinions rather than independent judicial findings, so they should be understood in that context.
Taken together, Schneider’s public profiles and court records show an evolution in his professional practice.
His earlier profile is associated with a broad range of civil, commercial, collections and business-related matters. His later public-facing work places greater emphasis on consumer protection, debt-related disputes and TCPA litigation.
The progression can be broadly summarized as:
2010 onward: Washington legal practice and general civil litigation
2013 onward: California admission and continued civil/business practice
2022: Montana and Oregon admissions
Recent years: Greater public emphasis on consumer protection, debt disputes and TCPA litigation
2026: Continued federal TCPA activity and Washington appellate litigation
This does not mean that Schneider practices exclusively in TCPA matters. Rather, TCPA and consumer litigation have become particularly visible components of his current public professional record.
The available public record supports several concrete conclusions about Peter Michael Schneider.
First, he is an attorney with more than a decade of professional experience, having been admitted to Washington in 2010.
Second, his historical practice was broader than consumer protection alone. The Lawyers.com/Martindale profile lists numerous civil, commercial, collection and litigation-related areas.
Third, consumer protection and TCPA litigation are now prominent components of his public legal profile.
Fourth, his name appears in federal TCPA litigation as counsel for plaintiffs.
Fifth, Washington appellate records show that his practice also includes non-TCPA civil and commercial litigation.
Finally, online attorney directories provide useful background information but should not be treated as substitutes for court records or official state-bar records when determining current licensing or disciplinary status.
Peter Michael Schneider is a Washington attorney whose practice has included consumer protection, TCPA litigation, collections, business disputes, contracts, civil litigation and other areas of law.
He earned his Juris Doctor from Seattle University School of Law in 2010.
His first listed admission was Washington in 2010. His attorney profiles also list later admissions in California, Montana and Oregon.
TCPA litigation is a documented part of Schneider’s legal practice. Federal court records show him representing parties in TCPA cases, while his public legal publications discuss TCPA litigation and related consumer-protection issues.
His older Lawyers.com/Martindale profile associates him with The Schneider Law Offices, PLLC in Kirkland, Washington. More recent court filings identify him with Northwest Debt Resolution, LLC in Bellevue, Washington.
Public attorney profiles have associated him with consumer protection, collections, unlawful business practices, civil litigation, business and commercial law, contracts, garnishments, personal injury and other litigation areas.
Yes. Avvo currently lists Peter Michael Schneider as a consumer-protection attorney and reports a 7.3 Avvo rating and two client reviews.
Yes. Washington appellate records identify Schneider as counsel in multiple cases, including P.S.C., Inc. v. Purdys Public House, LLC in 2026 and earlier litigation such as Columbia Recovery Group, LLC v. Bailey.
The profile above is based on publicly available attorney directories, official Washington court records, appellate opinions and publicly available litigation materials. Directory ratings, endorsements and client reviews are presented as information reported by those platforms and are not independent findings about an attorney’s performance.
This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not constitute a finding of professional misconduct, wrongdoing or liability by Peter Michael Schneider. Allegations, litigation positions, attorney-directory information, client reviews and judicial findings are different categories of information and should not be treated as interchangeable. Readers should consult official court records and the applicable state bar authority when verifying current licensing, disciplinary status or case outcomes.
Receive offers, product allerts, styling inspiration and more.
Learn what DNC.com does, how its TCPA and Do Not Call compliance tools work, Litigator Insights, reassigned-number screening, integrations, and its 2026 transition to Sonera.
Lawyer.com connects consumers with attorneys while operating a legal lead-generation and marketing platform. Explore its TCPA consent practices, automated calls, mass tort leads, compliance claims, and lawsuit history.
Cox Media Group has faced significant legal scrutiny, including an FTC Active Listening enforcement action and a Texas TCPA case involving defamation and free speech.
Explore Cox Media Group (CMG), its history, ownership, television and radio operations, digital advertising business, consumer data practices, privacy policy, Active Listening controversy, leadership and 2026 developments.
Explore MindSift’s data marketing platform, the Active Listening controversy, FTC allegations, 2026 consent order, consumer consent issues and legal implications.
Learn about MindSift, its audience intelligence and data platform, consumer and B2B databases, Visitor ID, Buyer Intent, OutReach Mining, advertising services, Active Listening controversy and 2026 FTC order.
